Moving back to cone 6
After trying working with my deep red clay at cone 9/10, I am moving back to cone 6. At least for the time being. I knew when I moved to cone 9/10 that I might …
After trying working with my deep red clay at cone 9/10, I am moving back to cone 6. At least for the time being. I knew when I moved to cone 9/10 that I might …
This is the batch I dug a few days ago and processed half of it to see if I can recreate the accidental perfect batch. I posted a few days ago. I kept it a …
In my last post (the clay with 0.3% absorption at cone 9 oxidation), I mentioned it comes from a low spot on top of a hill. Well, here it is.
This clay comes from an odd low spot, on top of a hill on our land. Right out of the ground, it’s very silty and not plastic enough to throw, fires to above cone 8. …
This body uses one of my lighter colored clays. It’s probably more than 50% sand right out of the ground, however, it’s very easy to process, settles out of a slurry wonderfully, and de-waters quickly. …
I haven’t been very good at keeping track of my clay tests recently. I need to blog about these as a way of keeping up with what tests I’ve run and what needs to be …
The reason I decided to switch to cone 10 reduction vs cone 6 oxidation was to limit the amount of materials I have to buy (and ship) and to reduce the amount of physical labor …
A customer asked me yesterday if it’s hard to let favorite pieces go. Yes, sometimes it is. But there are always pieces like this one. It’s a native clay body, and it was on the …
The day before yesterday, I did a test run of my cone 6 glazes at cone 10. The firing went a bit cool at 9.5 but close enough. However, I could not find my underglaze …
Pretty pleased with the results. This is 100% Moon Clay (dug in Moon, Oklahoma), except for the one pot that slumped. That clay was from beside my house. The Moon clay has 8.2% absorption at …